
For Australian private health insurers
Digestive-system care is a billion-dollar private-hospital category.2 Nerva gives your appropriately assessed members six weeks of digital brain-gut care, measured against the hospital benefits you actually pay.
The category, in fund-paid benefits
AUD 1.69bn
in fund-paid benefits across 685,000+ privately insured digestive-system separations in 2024–25.2
Not all GI spend is addressable, and not every scope is avoidable: these lower-bound figures establish a category worth investigating.2
Scaled to a book, approximately
Approximate: benefit figures are FY2024–25 HCP data, membership is APRA's March 2026 quarter, and both are industry-wide.2,9 The claims-feasibility session replaces these with your book's own numbers.
A single IBS query misses the population: admitted-care claims are organised around the episode, not the member. We help funds cross three layers, then apply clinical safeguards before treatment.
IBS and other DGBIs, abdominal pain, bloating, altered bowel habit.
Repeated investigation and recurrent same-day GI care across 24 to 36 months.
Scopes, related hospital episodes and the benefits your fund actually paid.
Your discovery cohort: members who appear in all three layers at once. That is what a single IBS code query can never return.
These are detection signals, not diagnoses: claims cannot show scope findings or symptom severity, so clinician confirmation stays in the loop.
Funds run heart, joint, weight and mental-wellbeing programs; persistent gut symptoms have had no equivalent. Nerva delivers guideline-recognised brain-gut behavioural care10 in software, with screening and escalation by humans.
Eligibility and safety screening.
One 15-minute session, six weeks.
Validated symptom measures.
Flare support and re-engagement.
Reporting on the agreed measures.
Back to the member's clinician.
of participants had clinically meaningful IBS symptom improvement at completion, compared with the active control, in a 244-adult randomised trial.
Randomised controlled trial · N=244 · active control · AJG 2025 Read the research →
The boundaryNerva has strong evidence of symptom benefit. The Australian hospital-claims effect is what a fund partnership would test.
Partnership spotlight
Since March 2025, eligible HIF members have accessed Nerva through their fund, with eligibility, activation and outcomes reporting running as a member health program.
Program facts as at August 2026.7 Activation and outcome figures are shared with funds under discussion.
The chronic disease management wrapper is dietitian-led and configured with each fund; each element maps to the Health Insurance Business Rules' requirements for a chronic disease management program.11
How you offer the program, as a CDMP benefit, a member health program or an Extras item, is a product decision, not a rebuild. Australia-wide dietitian referrals are how members already arrive.8
We work with your team to identify the eligible cohort, understand its current hospital use and set a break-even hurdle before a pilot begins.
Define the cohort, its current hospital use and a break-even hurdle from your data.
Agree eligibility, governance, outcomes, comparison method and commercial terms.
Expand, modify or stop using pre-agreed rules.
Pay only for members who activate, with an optional component linked to an agreed symptom outcome while local claims evidence is generated.
Break-even is a formula your team fills in, not a figure we assert. The feasibility session fills in your numbers before any pilot is scoped.
Cohorts too small to measure: aggregate reporting and a claims read-out need scale, and we would rather say so first.
Funds that need guaranteed utilisation reductions before a pilot: the Australian hospital-claims effect is exactly what the pilot tests.
Funds without longitudinal claims capability: the identification and evaluation both depend on linking a member's claims over time.
Programs premised on unconfirmed regulatory treatment: how your fund classifies and offers the program is your product and governance decision.
A short working session across health programs, claims and clinical governance: map the signals, connect them to paid hospital events, and decide whether a retrospective analysis is worth running.
No. Nerva complements existing care. Diagnosis, prescribing, procedures and complex management stay with the member's clinicians; Nerva delivers the brain-gut behavioural layer and routes members back when clinical review is needed.
Claims-sizing comes first. A pilot follows only if the numbers are credible, on pre-agreed terms.
Nerva complements existing clinical care and does not replace a gastroenterologist, dietitian or psychologist. Program availability through a fund depends on that fund's own rules, product governance and clinical review.